Homosexual Marriage Needs to Be Legalized Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

transsexual(prenominal) Marriage Needs to Be Legalized - Essay ExampleThis would never shoot happened if Charlene and Kate were allowed to legally marry. Today, gay nuptials ceremony is illegal in about states in America, and this is unconstitutional, as it is violating a implicit in(p) right, which is marriage. The most egregious function about the issue of denying gay marriage is that there really is not a legitimate assertion put forth by the opposite side which would substantiate keeping an entire class of slew from enjoying basic rights. For instance, consider the slippery slope argument. This argument states that if homosexuals were allowed to marry, then the legislatures would have to legalize marriage mingled with man and dog, man and daughter, man and 12-year-old boy. This argument does not hold water for two major reasons one, marriage between two homosexuals is sanctifying a consensual relationship, and all the other scenarios above would not be. And, two, perh aps most importantly, pedophilia, incest and bestiality are all illegal, probably in all fifty states. Homosexual relationships, on the other hand, are not, and cannot be due to the case of Lawrence v. Texas, a 2003 Supreme Court case which launch that anal sex laws are unconstitutional. Therein lies a difference legislatures cannot be pressured to legalize marriage ground upon relationships which are illegal, such(prenominal) as pedophilia, incest and bestiality, therefore the slippery slope argument is not legitimate. Another argument is that marriage is based upon procreation, and, since homosexuals cannot make, they should be denied the right to marry. This argument cannot be logically consistent, because, if the argument were to carried out to its logical conclusion, anybody and everybody who would be inefficient or unwilling to have children would also be denied the right to marry. Your grandmother in the nursing billet who met her soul mate at the age of 86? Sorry, gran dma, you cant marry because you cant have children anymore. Your sister who had ovarian genus Cancer and had to have a hysterectomy? Sorry, sis, you cant marry either, because you are unable to have children. This is the logical extension of the ?ays cant marry because they cannot procreate argument,one that the supporters of this argument must adopt if they are to be logically consistent. Of course, the other major argument is that quirk is proscribed by the Bible, but this is not a comelyification for denying a constitutional right. Roe v. Wade4 established this, as it states that morality is not a legitimate concern upon which to base a law that affects ones fundamental rights. And besides, if legislatures are going to start basing their laws on Biblical proscriptions, then they are going to have to malefactor drinking and getting rowdy at Sunday football games, as this would be desecrating the Sabbath, and this is an offense penal by death according to Exodus 3114.5 As for t he argument that allowing homosexuals to marry would undermine the sanctity of marriage exhibit A to refute this argument would be Kim Kardashian. If her sham of a marriage, 72 eld long, is not undermining the sanctity of the institution of marriage, then what is? Of course, it would be unfair to single her out, as there have been countless celebrities whose marriages lasted well short of a year. Not to mention Elizabeth Taylor, who was married eight times. These are just celebrities there are countless people who are not famous who are in the very(prenominal) predicament. Who doesnt have an uncle with five ex-wives? In short, heterosexuals